electricity supplier development so far, has long been in violation of the traditional line of physical sales share. But on the one hand, we have been calling on the state fair treatment of electricity providers can not suppress the electricity supplier, on the one hand, in the form of tax avoidance to get higher benefits than the line. Since the electricity supplier has become an important economic behavior, enjoy the same preferential policies under the same line is not without reason.
Whether the tax
business has been discussed for many years, submit a proposal to tax electricity supplier in NPC and CPPCC chairman Su ningyun Zhang Jindong for two consecutive years. Due to the impact of the electricity supplier before the development of the electricity supplier after the tax impact on the work of the tax has not seen below. But I believe that the moment has come to a critical moment in the electricity supplier tax.
it is understood titanium media, China’s first "electronic commerce law" is expected in the second half, the advent of the business enterprise gradually in the north, East and other regions to carry out electronic invoices, tax identification number system will be introduced, these changes include a new industry top layer design electricity supplier taxation legal framework, and to remove the obstacles to the actual in operation, the electricity supplier taxation jianxingjianjin.
first, the electricity supplier will be taxed under the line entity sales and electricity providers equal treatment
business development has long been in the entity erode the traditional offline sales share, Beijing Zhongguancun several large electronic shopping malls have a deserted house. But on the one hand, we have been calling on the state fair treatment of electricity providers can not suppress the electricity supplier, on the one hand, in the form of tax avoidance to get higher benefits than the line.
this is an unfair phenomenon, since the electricity supplier and the entity under the same line belong to economic activities, it should assume the same responsibilities and obligations. And if one party can legally tax avoidance, then beat the other party is not necessarily a business model, but the price advantage of tax avoidance.
the current electricity supplier price war has been part of the industrial entities under the line sales beat almost, the major electricity supplier platforms have reported their share in foreign transactions, so under the size of the body if not for the sales tax supervision entity is too unfair.
of course, the main electricity supplier tax C store, the majority of the B shop has a relatively complete invoice system. But it is not because the C shop on the heart of compassion, by the nature of tax avoidance.
second, the tax is an important means of national economic behavior monitoring
regardless of the B shop is also a C store, the volume of its share of the country’s retail sales are rising, so the national level of statistics and supervision is to accurately monitor its data to facilitate the introduction of appropriate policies.
is the most effective way to obtain the transaction data through the tax and tax declaration mandatory measures, the tax itself will bear the function of data monitoring. Of course, a voice said to the transaction data can be directly retrieved platform, need not trouble tax. But iron brother is considered through the tax data will be more realistic, but also avoid the platform >